Marketing Strategy vs Tactics: Diagnose Before You Prescribe
Marketing strategy vs tactics is more than a naming debate. Tactics are the treatments, and strategy is the diagnosis that tells you which treatments to use.
Key takeaways
- Tactics are actions such as ads, emails and events. Strategy is the reasoning that decides which actions matter.
- Richard Rumelt describes the core of a good strategy as a diagnosis, a guiding policy and coherent actions.
- If your plan cannot say what problem it solves, it is a list of tactics.
Ask a team for its marketing strategy and you will often get a list: a new website, two trade shows, a LinkedIn campaign and a monthly newsletter. Those are tactics. Each one may be sensible, but nothing on the list explains why these actions, in this order, will grow the business.
That gap is expensive. Without a strategy, every tactic competes for budget on its own merits, so spend drifts toward whatever is newest or easiest to report.
Marketing strategy vs tactics: the difference
A tactic is something you do. A strategy is a reasoned choice about where to focus and why, so it rules some tactics in and many others out.
The marketing strategy vs tactics question matters because the two fail in different ways. A good tactic inside a bad strategy still loses money, while a strong strategy can survive a few weak tactics.
The three parts of a real strategy
Richard Rumelt’s book Good Strategy Bad Strategy, published in 2011, describes what he calls the kernel of a strategy. It has three parts, and they map neatly onto how a doctor works.
- A diagnosis. A clear statement of the main challenge. For example: buyers do not see how we differ from cheaper competitors.
- A guiding policy. The overall approach to that challenge. For example: compete on specialist expertise for one industry instead of on price.
- Coherent actions. Steps that support each other and carry out the policy, such as industry case studies, a niche event and a sales script built around that expertise.
Most marketing plans skip the diagnosis. They jump straight to actions, so nobody can say what problem those actions are meant to solve.
Signs you have tactics without a strategy
- Every channel has its own goal, but nobody can explain how they connect.
- The plan would look the same for any company in your category.
- Budget moves to whichever channel reported the best numbers last quarter.
- New tools get adopted because a competitor uses them.
- Nobody can name something the team decided not to do.
That last sign is the most telling. A strategy is a set of choices, and choices mean saying no to things that look attractive.
How to write the diagnosis first
Start with evidence rather than opinions. Look at win and loss data, customer interviews and your funnel by stage. Then write one or two sentences describing the main obstacle to growth.
A useful diagnosis is specific enough to argue with. “We need more awareness” is too vague to act on. “Buyers in our region shortlist three firms, and we are rarely one of them” points to a clear problem, and it suggests what to try.
Once the diagnosis is agreed, the guiding policy usually follows. After that, choosing tactics becomes much faster, because each one either serves the policy or it does not.
Where tactics still matter
None of this means tactics are unimportant. Execution decides whether a sound strategy pays off, so the craft of ads, emails and events still counts.
The point of the marketing strategy vs tactics distinction is the order of work. Diagnose first, then choose a policy, then prescribe the treatments. Our guide to brand positioning covers one of the most common diagnoses we find. If you would like an outside view of yours, book a free diagnosis.
Related guides
Find out where your marketing is bleeding.
Brand Doctor is based in Vancouver and offers a free marketing diagnosis to businesses across Canada, in person or remotely. You leave knowing what’s holding growth back and what to fix first.
